Other Than Their Definition of News Differs From Mine
Finish this line:
I think the problem with television news is that....
« The Daily Question From A Blogfriend | Main | The "Hello, Michele Sent Me" Meet 'N' Greet »
May 14, 2008
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
omigawd--I'm first!
The problem with television news is they have replaced "hard news" with fluff and 24 hr news channels have too much time to fill with scandal and speculation.
Posted by: Bev | May 14, 2008 at 02:03 AM
it's the same crap everyday or regular news isn't on when i actually want to watch it.
Posted by: Katya | May 14, 2008 at 02:47 AM
It's on television, and who gives a tinker's dam about Brangelina, Lindsay, Britney, or Tom Cruise?
Posted by: Mamacita | May 14, 2008 at 03:00 AM
some is true, some is trash, some is time filling. some is eye opening.
Posted by: marisa | May 14, 2008 at 07:19 AM
it reports sports stories and scores which, to me, is no different than reporting entertainment news.
Posted by: Jennie | May 14, 2008 at 07:41 AM
All of the above.
Posted by: kenju | May 14, 2008 at 08:25 AM
it has the same content as the Entertainment news.
Posted by: Keith | May 14, 2008 at 08:53 AM
It's biased and short of the entire situation. But of course these things help generate higher ratings!
Posted by: Nepharia | May 14, 2008 at 09:17 AM
it's almost always bad.
Posted by: Fluke Starbucker | May 14, 2008 at 09:42 AM
it's ratings driven.
Posted by: Janet | May 14, 2008 at 09:55 AM
It's either badly skewed or irrelevant information.
Posted by: HugotheChinchilla | May 14, 2008 at 11:49 AM
...there's too much of it, which drives the overwhelming amount of carploa that serves as filler...
Posted by: Thumper | May 14, 2008 at 01:43 PM
we don't need 3 hours of it every evening!!!
Posted by: Sara | May 14, 2008 at 04:05 PM
they think that we really want to hear all that crap night after night.
Posted by: Diana | May 14, 2008 at 06:35 PM
that it is there....twisted as it is.
Posted by: rosemary | May 14, 2008 at 07:30 PM
they spend more time telling us what they are GOING to tell us than ACTUALLY telling us. (I hope you can follow that!)
Posted by: sister AE | May 14, 2008 at 07:56 PM
there are too many commercials
Posted by: michelle | May 14, 2008 at 09:21 PM
they only tell us what they think we should hear.
Posted by: barbie2be | May 15, 2008 at 01:10 PM
It's all repeats of the good stuff, they don't really make anything original anymore or if they do they BATTER the format to death.
Posted by: Gordon | May 15, 2008 at 04:41 PM
they only tell you what they want to.
Posted by: flleenie | May 16, 2008 at 01:57 AM
It's a corporate business with too much time wasted on chit chat and not enough investigation.
Posted by: colleen | May 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM
It can get so depressing!
Posted by: Sol | May 16, 2008 at 08:00 PM
My news conspiracy theory... Numb their minds with the same old blah blah blah so they won't care what's going on...
Posted by: Sue | May 17, 2008 at 06:36 AM
it's all very one-sided, and it's all doom-and-gloom.
Posted by: Kisane | May 18, 2008 at 01:32 PM
nepotism in hiring practices, incompetence and cruelly manipulating issues with no regard to the effect on individuals/society.
Posted by: thebluestbutterfly | May 19, 2008 at 01:53 AM
It's not about journalism, but ratings.
And it's on too many times a day.
And they don't report on Broadway Musicals.
And they don't have surprise celebrity cameos.
~S
Posted by: Shephard | May 19, 2008 at 02:02 PM