Sharing a note that I recently received:
To: michele's e-mail address
From: mr. helpful's e-mail address,
RE: pic problemHi There!!
I just discovered ur blog yesterday. GREAT legs babe, but the top half of the pic is missing, like its been cut in half or something like that. I thought it was my browser but it does it at home and work. Is it just me or maybe its a temp. problem but I thought I should bring it to ur attention. I am looking forward to seeing more of you once the pic is fixed or tell me what to do to see it better.
Mr. Helpful (real name not used)
Oh. No. Is this true? Is there a problem with my picture in the sidebar? Does it appear to be "cut in half or something"? It appears fine in my browser, but, as many of you know, I have a special only-one-L browser. Has anyone else ever noticed this problem? Could someone please suggest what Mr. Helpful could do to "see it better." Please, any and all advice is appreciated.
Can you imagine, almost three years of doing this blog and no one, not one single person, has ever pointed out this problem before? I am shocked, and yet, not.
Good thing you get new readers to pick up on the things the rest of us have missed all these years. Because, yes, indeed, the upper part of you is MISSING! I guess the legs (and the shoes) are so great that no one else ever noticed.
Posted by: Bluegrass Mama | September 24, 2007 at 09:42 PM
Actually, I don't think that the upper half is missing: I think that it is just hidden behind the "welcome" sign. Since I'm always happy to be made welcome, I never thought that I should mention it:-)
N.
Posted by: BreadBox | September 24, 2007 at 09:47 PM
Weird! I just thought my eyelids were drooping.
Posted by: Jennie | September 24, 2007 at 09:50 PM
Well thank GAWD it isn't just me....I am not computer savvy and being of a certain age, I thought....well, it was just me...whew!
Posted by: rosemary | September 24, 2007 at 10:11 PM
Silly silly- I think the picture says so much as it stands- looks fine to me.
So do you like being called 'babe'? I work at a job in which I talk on the phone all day & at least 2 or 3 guys talk to me like that on the phone. It drives me nuts!
Posted by: Becky68 | September 24, 2007 at 10:40 PM
it looks fine on my computer. weird!
Posted by: barbie2be | September 24, 2007 at 10:40 PM
I noticed it, of course, but I think it is fine the way it is. Wouldn't want to reveal too much, would we?
Posted by: kenju | September 24, 2007 at 10:53 PM
1. If you turn the monitor upside down, you can see that she is not wearing panties.
2. It seems as though the pixel distributor needs to be refragmented.
3. Are the legs dancing? The dancing feature has a few kinks to be worked out.
4. Most of us only get the upper half picture.
5. What is this picture you speak of?
6. We don't mention that picture since the accident.....such a lovely girl.
7. Since you tried to resolve the issue at work, we suggest bringing your company's tech guys in for a meeting.
8. Try the library computer.
9. Full resolution is only found via the Commodore 64.
10. To view the full picture one must ID the shoe manufacturer. Say the name three times fast. There it is all good now.
Posted by: caspar | September 24, 2007 at 11:03 PM
Mr. Helpful,
I've never looked beyond those great legs for the rest of the photo. My bad.
Finally, in this day and age, do people really refer to a lady as "babe." If so, why?
Stella
Posted by: Stella | September 25, 2007 at 12:17 AM
There's a picture? dammit...well, at least now have an excuse to buy a new monitor...
Posted by: Thumper | September 25, 2007 at 01:34 AM
Holy! Really? Your upper body is missing? I see it just fine. Mr. Helpful needs to go and buy a new computer, methinks. And a better monitor, too.
Posted by: Tanya (aka Netchick) | September 25, 2007 at 03:32 AM
If that's half, you're WAY taller than I am. How long IS your torso?
:giggles:
Posted by: Leanne | September 25, 2007 at 07:50 AM
It's not a problem, but I'm sure we can all relate to his wanting more.
Posted by: Fluke Starbucker | September 25, 2007 at 08:08 AM
Some people just don't understand art. ;)
And u do have great legs, babe!
heehee
Posted by: aka_monty | September 25, 2007 at 09:26 AM
hey babe, just tell the truth. You HAVE no upper half.
Posted by: anniebird | September 25, 2007 at 09:51 AM
I just read Caspar's comments. Hilarious. Really, why do any of the rest of us bother when dear Caspar has answered so astutely?
Posted by: anniebird | September 25, 2007 at 10:00 AM
LOL! I think I love Caspar now! Brilliant!
Posted by: Indigo | September 25, 2007 at 11:37 AM
You look just like Sandra Bullock on my browser.
~S
Posted by: Shephard | September 25, 2007 at 01:29 PM
I just appreciated the unique photography...didn't realize the other half was "missing"!
Posted by: Linda | September 25, 2007 at 01:49 PM
And Here I thought that Michelle was just all legs...
LMBO at Casper he has answer this I think the best
Mr Helpful with legs like that do you really think she is a little pig?
Posted by: novy | September 25, 2007 at 02:43 PM
I question the overall intelligence of someone who types "ur".
Posted by: annie | September 25, 2007 at 03:36 PM
Heh. I remember once you shared a picture showing the top half of Michele...the word. It cracked me up.
Posted by: -E | September 26, 2007 at 01:48 AM
you look fabulous on my computer.
Posted by: mrc1471 | September 26, 2007 at 02:06 AM
Well "Mr. Helpful (real name not used)" Those may not be Michele's real legs used!!
Posted by: flleenie | September 27, 2007 at 04:44 AM
Mr. Helpful sounds like a lot of people I work with. Could my coworkers be frequenting micheleagnew.com? If so, good for them!
Posted by: Goldie | September 29, 2007 at 10:05 PM